Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes
    • The Product Book

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / App Notes / 2015 / Analysis of Vitamin D in Milk and Infant Formula using UHPLC-MS-MS per AOAC Method 2011 11

Analysis of Vitamin D in Milk and Infant Formula using UHPLC-MS-MS per AOAC Method 2011 11

07/15/2015

Share

Featured Image
Introduction

Fortification of milk, dairy products, infant and adult nutritionals with vitamin D is required in many countries to provide additional dietary vitamin D. The fortification of milk in the USA, for example, is done at 400 International Units (IU) per eight ounces of milk. The recently adopted AOAC method 2011.11 describes the procedure for the analysis of vitamin D in fortified infant formula. This method was used in the current work to measure vitamin D in the fortified whole milk and in an infant formula sample. Two forms of vitamin D are recognized: vitamin D2 or ergocalciferol and vitamin D3 or cholecalciferol. Although both forms may be present in the fortified food, vitamin D3 is more commonly used for fortification of dairy products. Vitamin D hydroxy-metabolites can also be present in food products at low levels. While quantitative analysis was performed for vitamins D2 and D3, the samples were scanned for the presence of 25-hydroxy metabolites.

Method

AOAC method 2011.11 was followed for analysis of vitamin D in both milk and infant formula. Vitamin D2 and D3 standards and their deuterated analogues were used. The UHPLC column was Titan C18, 10 cm x 2.1 mm packed with 1.9 μm particles. The HPLC method was adopted from the standard AOAC method, including mobile phases, gradient, and flow rates. Baseline separation between vitamin D3 and D2 peaks, and between all vitamins and matrix component peaks was obtained on the Titan C18 UHPLC column. Analysis of vitamin D was done using MS/MS with APCI detection. MS transitions used in this study are shown in Table 1.
The sample preparation for both milk and infant formula samples was done through saponification, extraction, evaporation, and reconstitution of extracts into LC-compatible solvents. The sample preparation steps following AOAC method 2011.11 are shown in Figure 1.

Download the full Application Note as PDF

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition
NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition

January 16, 2015

Portable NIR spectroscopy of grazing animal feces ...

Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change
Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change

January 16, 2015

A fluorescence-based assay helps study carbon fixa...

Why They Choose FDGSi
Why They Choose FDGSi

February 17, 2015

Find out why companies choose F-DGSi

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold
Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold

February 27, 2015

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs...

Thank you for reading The Analytical Scientist

To continue reading, either register for a free account below or login.

Register or Login

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.