Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes
    • The Product Book

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / App Notes / 2015 / Utilizing Novel SPME LC Tips for Forensic Screening of Drugs of Abuse in Urine Samples

Utilizing Novel SPME LC Tips for Forensic Screening of Drugs of Abuse in Urine Samples

10/15/2015

Share

Featured Image
Introduction

The monitoring of drugs of abuse in biological matrices is a large and growing business for the laboratory testing industry. Testing urine for the presence of drugs of abuse requires methodology sensitive enough to monitor well below therapeutic levels and selective enough for clear identification of specific drugs without false positives. Current methodologies for urine analysis typically involve immunoassay, which is often not specific to an individual drug. This means samples must be subject to confirmation using LC/MS/MS or GC/MS. The importance of sample prep for improving sensitivity and robustness of MS methods is well-known. In this brief report, we will discuss the application of SPME for the extraction of metabolites of illicit drugs from urine samples with subsequent analysis by LC/MS/MS. Applying SPME to this type of analysis has been made possible with the introduction of new fibers that are compatible with HPLC solvents and biological samples.

SPME LC Tips

SPME LC Tips pictured in Figure 1 consist of fiber cores coated with HPLC-type silica particles held in place on the fiber with a special polymeric binder. The coatings used in the SPME LC Tips were designed to overcome the limitations of traditional SPME fiber coatings, making them suitable for extraction in biological matrix and for direct solvent desorption. In the fibers described here, the silica particles are bonded with C18 molecules, allowing for extraction of analytes from highly aqueous samples. The particle binder prevents sample matrix components from co-extracting onto the fiber. In this study, the SPME LC Tips were utilized as a direct sampling method for analysis of illicit drugs in human urine. Cocaine and its metabolites benzoylecgonine and cocaethylene, norfentanyl, and methadone and its metabolite EDDP, were selected as representative drugs and metabolites. Structures appear in Figure 2. Matrix-matched standards with isotopically labeled internal standards were prepared for development of the calibration curve. Patient urine samples were collected at a collaborative testing facility and submitted for SPME extraction. The urine samples had previously tested positive by ELISA techniques for the presence of either cocaine metabolites or methadone metabolites, but actual concentration levels were not determined. These samples were then analyzed using the SPME LC Tips extraction technique for comparison. Sample preparation for the urine samples was minimal, with only the addition of buffer. The SPME LC Tips were placed into the urine samples, then directly desorbed and analyzed by LC/MS/MS. Extraction technique and chromatographic conditions are described.

Figure 2. Structures of Analytes used in the Study
>> Download the full Application Note as PDF

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition
NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition

January 16, 2015

Portable NIR spectroscopy of grazing animal feces ...

Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change
Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change

January 16, 2015

A fluorescence-based assay helps study carbon fixa...

Why They Choose FDGSi
Why They Choose FDGSi

February 17, 2015

Find out why companies choose F-DGSi

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold
Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold

February 27, 2015

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs...

Thank you for reading The Analytical Scientist

To continue reading, either register for a free account below or login.

Register or Login

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.