Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / App Notes / 2015 / Determination of PBDEs in Sediment Samples using the SpeedExtractor E-914

Determination of PBDEs in Sediment Samples using the SpeedExtractor E-914

11/10/2015

Share

Featured Image
Introduction

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are flame retardants used in a myriad of applications and are monitored worldwide because of health concerns. In this application, PBDE congeners were extracted from two sediment samples (certified sample and sediment core from Lake Maggiore) according to EPA 3545A [1] using the SpeedExtractor E-914 and determined by GCMS/GC-ECD. The results were comparable to the certified values and showed high reproducibility and recovery.

PBDEs are brominated flame retardants used in a myriad of applications (Figure 1). They are monitored worldwide because of health concerns. Bay and estuary sediments store toxic compounds and are therefore very appropriate sites to evaluate the contamination level of PBDEs in the environment. This application note describes the extraction of PBDEs from two sediment samples using the SpeedExtractor E-914: one certified sediment sample BROC-02 (RIVO, The Netherlands), one real sample from lake Maggiore, Italy. The PBDE congeners were determined by GCMS/GC-ECD.

Figure 1: Chemical structure of PBDEs
Experimental

Instrumentation: SpeedExtractor E-914 with 40 ml cells, Trace 2000 GC / PolarisQ ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo), Trace GC Ultra / ECD-40 detector (Thermo). Sample: Certified reference material (CRM) BROC-02 provided by the Research Institute for Fisheries (RIVO), The Netherlands, sediment sample collected from Pallanza Bay, Lake Maggiore, Italy. The extraction of both samples was performed four-fold using the parameters given in Table 1. This extraction method requires an overall time of 26 min and consumes
approx. 30 ml of solvent per position.

Table 1: Extraction method of the SpeedExtractor E-914

The extract was concentrated and cleaned on a multi-layer silica gel/florisil column. The determination of tri- to hepta- BDEs was performed by GC-MS. The congener BDE-209 was determined by GC-ECD.

>> Download the full Application Note as PDF

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical scientist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Analytical Science

Dive deeper into the analytical science. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition
NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition

January 16, 2015

Portable NIR spectroscopy of grazing animal feces ...

Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change
Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change

January 16, 2015

A fluorescence-based assay helps study carbon fixa...

Why They Choose FDGSi
Why They Choose FDGSi

February 17, 2015

Find out why companies choose F-DGSi

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold
Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold

February 27, 2015

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs...

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.