Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data & AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma & Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2014 / May / Learning Without Doing Equals Shortcoming

Learning Without Doing Equals Shortcoming

Removing practical assessments from science education is illogical, say UK chemical engineers

By Rich Whitworth 05/27/2014 1 min read

Share

In the UK, Ofqual (the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation) is charged with maintaining standards and confidence in qualifications. Ofqual has decided to remove the practical examination and grading component from biology, chemistry and physics A-levels (taken by 16-18 year olds) from the 2015 new academic year, much to the annoyance of the Institute for Chemical Engineers (IChemE). IChemE’s chief executive David Brown said, “… it seems illogical to remove practical assessments from science, when it remains at the heart of grading in other subjects.”

Brown continued, “Chemical and process engineering employers need graduates and apprentices with strong practical skills as well as sound knowledge and understanding.” As George Whiteside notes in last month’s feature, enjoying the day-by-day activities of a profession (including “washing dirty dishes”) is often more important than aspiring to reward or great success. By removing practical assessments, students are likely to focus more heavily on written work rather than the exciting (and challenging) aspect of experimentation, which could deter them from continuing into graduate level education. “The changes will not help students who we know are inspired and motivated by doing science […] And they will not help universities, colleges and companies who already struggle to recruit people with the practical experience they need,” said Campaign for Science and Engineering’s (CaSE) director, Sarah Main.

The UK Chemical Industries Association “Policy Issues” report notes that 90 percent of chemical businesses surveyed in the UK had some difficult in recruiting science graduates. In addition, 69 percent of companies felt that they were training their staff in skills that should have been learned at school, college or university (1). What’s the status of school education where you are? Let us know by commenting below.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. www.cia.org.uk/Policyissues/Skills.asp

About the Author(s)

Rich Whitworth

Rich Whitworth completed his studies in medical biochemistry at the University of Leicester, UK, in 1998. To cut a long story short, he escaped to Tokyo to spend five years working for the largest English language publisher in Japan. "Carving out a career in the megalopolis that is Tokyo changed my outlook forever. When seeing life through such a kaleidoscopic lens, it's hard not to get truly caught up in the moment." On returning to the UK, after a few false starts with grey, corporate publishers, Rich was snapped up by Texere Publishing, where he spearheaded the editorial development of The Analytical Scientist. "I feel honored to be part of the close-knit team that forged The Analytical Scientist – we've created a very fresh and forward-thinking publication." Rich is now also Content Director of Texere Publishing, the company behind The Analytical Scientist.

More Articles by Rich Whitworth

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.