Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / App Notes / 2015 / Chromatographic reproducibility of the novel ionKey/MS System

Chromatographic reproducibility of the novel ionKey/MS System

06/11/2015

Share

Featured Image
Goal

To evaluate chromatographic retention time and system reproducibility of Waters® ionKey/MS™ System.

Background

Chromatographic reproducibility is an essential requirement in any analytical laboratory environment. Parameters such as chromatographic retention time (RT), peak width (PW), peak tailing, and area counts are often monitored during system suitability testing before assays can begin on any liquid chromatography system. A critical component to obtaining highly reproducible LC-MS results is the consistent performance of the separations devices utilized. Chromatographic retention time reproducibility is not only dependent on the quality and consistency in the manufacturing of the separations devices, but is also effected by gradient formation, system pressure, flow rate and temperature control.Historically, these later variables, controlled by system hardware, have been shown to be a source of poor performance and reproducibility of results for LC-MS systems that operate in the low nL-μL/min flow rate ranges.

The Solution

The ionKey/MS System, shown in Figure 1, integrates the UPLC® separation directly into the source of the mass spectrometer. The system combines the ACQUITY UPLC® M-Class and the Xevo® TQ-S Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer with the iKey™ Separation Device. The iKey consists of the ceramic-based separations channel, packed with UPLC grade particles, an integrated emitter, fluidic connections, electronics, ESI interface, heater, and e-cord. Once inserted into the source, all fluidic connections are made through the turn of a handle thereby creating a true “plug and play” capillary LC-MS instrument.

>> Download the full Application Note as PDF

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical scientist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Analytical Science

Dive deeper into the analytical science. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition
NIR on the Range: Grazing Animal Nutrition

January 16, 2015

Portable NIR spectroscopy of grazing animal feces ...

Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change
Oceans Help Predict a Wave of Climate Change

January 16, 2015

A fluorescence-based assay helps study carbon fixa...

Why They Choose FDGSi
Why They Choose FDGSi

February 17, 2015

Find out why companies choose F-DGSi

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold
Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs. Manual Sample Processing Using a Vacuum Manifold

February 27, 2015

Comparison of Biotage® Extrahera™ vs...

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.