Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes
    • The Product Book

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / App Notes / 2017 / Comparing the rheology and particle size of smoothies made with different blenders

Comparing the rheology and particle size of smoothies made with different blenders

06/02/2017

Share

Featured Image

Abstract

Two smoothie makers have been evaluated and compared by measuring the particle (fiber) size and viscosity of two different smoothies recipes to see which smoothie maker gave the smoothest blend.

Introduction

Smoothies have been around for the best part of a century although it was not until the development, commercialization and evolution of the blender between 1920 and 1950 that home-made smoothies (in the modern sense) became possible. Their popularity was further accelerated by the health food movement of the 1960’s and more recently the commercialization of dedicated smoothie makers, combined with a trend towards natural and nutritious foods [1].

In the Oxford English dictionary a smoothie is defined as ‘a smooth, thick drink made with puréed fresh fruit and yogurt, ice cream, or milk’. However, there does not seem to be any fixed rules to what should go in to a smoothie with common additions being vegetables, crushed ice, nuts, seeds and extra juice or water.

What is widely accepted is that a smoothie should be as smooth and easy to consume as possible, aspects which are related to the particle size of the blended components and the viscosity of the suspension. While the viscosity of the blend can be controlled most easily by the choice of ingredients and amount of liquid used, the particle size of a given set of blended ingredients is directly dependent on the performance of the blender. This is often the main criteria that consumers will use to judge the quality of a blender – the taste test [2]. In this study, two smoothie makers have been evaluated and compared by measuring the particle (fiber) size and viscosity of two smoothie recipes prepared with the different blenders.

Materials and Methods

Two different smoothies were prepared and analysed in this study; a pink and a green smoothie with the following compositions. Green Smoothie 100 g pineapple
100 g apple
10 g spinach
70 g water Pink smoothie 100 g apple
30 g pineapple
10 g spinach
60 g berries
70 g water
>> Download the full Application Note as PDF

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Solvents & Inorganics for accurate, brilliant results
Solvents & Inorganics for accurate, brilliant results

January 9, 2017

Now that the life science business of Merck KGaA, ...

Discovery of Sulfur-Containing Compounds in Broccoli with GC-TOFMS
Discovery of Sulfur-Containing Compounds in Broccoli with GC-TOFMS

January 16, 2017

Analyzing samples of a raw broccoli and a broccoli that was processed to be sold frozen we show the sample-distinguishing differences that occur during food processing...

Aquastar® reagents for brilliant Karl Fischer titration results
Aquastar® reagents for brilliant Karl Fischer titration results

January 23, 2017

Determining the water content of gases, liquids and solids can be achieved with a high degree of accuracy using Karl Fischer titration together with our Aquastar® reagents and standards from Merck...

REACH Polymer Status determined with GPC/SEC
REACH Polymer Status determined with GPC/SEC

January 27, 2017

Polymers are “special substances” in terms of REACH...

Thank you for reading The Analytical Scientist

To continue reading, either register for a free account below or login.

Register or Login

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.