Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / App Notes / 2019 / PFAS LC Column Anatomy: Which Phase, Dimensions, and Particle Type Are Best?

PFAS LC Column Anatomy: Which Phase, Dimensions, and Particle Type Are Best?

11/08/2019

Share

Featured Image

If you work in one of the many labs routinely testing samples for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), you know that awareness and interest are growing as we continue to better understand the pervasiveness, persistence, and potential health risks associated with these “forever chemicals.” As interest grows, the need for fast, accurate, and precise testing is growing with it. This demand is driving the development of better methods, and LC column selection is the foundation for building an improved approach. Here, we’ll examine the properties that are important to consider when choosing an LC column for PFAS analysis.

Column Phase Selection

The first decision to make when determining which PFAS LC column to use is identifying an effective stationary phase. In our scouting of different phase chemistries for the analysis of short-chain PFAS (C4-C6) and above, the C18 phase proved to be the best choice. As the alkyl chain on PFAS molecules gets longer, the interactions between those chains and the C18 ligand increase, providing a great mechanism for retention and resolution. Retention is strong enough that a relatively short and narrow column can be used to quickly and effectively resolve target analytes. The example in Figure 1 shows that a 50 x 2.1 mm Raptor C18 column easily elutes and separates the compounds of interest while meeting all of EPA 537.1 method criteria for drinking water testing in less than 8 minutes (10 minute total analysis time).

When C8 PFAS were banned, other compounds with shorter alkyl chains were commercially adopted, and as the list of PFAS of interest grows, compounds with chains shorter than 4 carbons or ultrashort-chain (C2 and C3) are getting more attention. As the length of the carbon chain decreases, the influence of the polar head increases, ultimately decreasing retention on a C18 column, which has a retention mechanism based primarily on hydrophobic interaction.

For C3 PFAS compounds like perfluoropropanoic acid (PFPrA) and perfluoropropanesulfonic acid (PFPrS), a C18 phase will still work when appropriate column dimensions are selected. In Figure 2, for example, a 100 x 3 mm Raptor C18 shows great performance, easily incorporating ultrashort-chain PFAS compounds into a quick 11-minute analysis.

If C2 PFAS (e.g., trifluoroacetic acid) eventually make it on a list of monitored compounds, an alternate phase chemistry that targets the polar moiety of a PFAS molecule will likely be required.

>> Download the full Application Note as PDF

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathologist news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

Explore More in Pathology

Dive deeper into the world of pathology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Ionic impurities in drug products – USP proposes new ion chromatography method
Ionic impurities in drug products – USP proposes new ion chromatography method

January 21, 2019

Chloride and sulfate are common impurities present in drug substances and drug products...

Decoding Dangerous Drinks with a Spectral Sensor
Decoding Dangerous Drinks with a Spectral Sensor

January 24, 2019

Have you ever heard that moonshine will make you go blind? Today, even your favorite, top-shelf liquor may be just as much of a risk...

Volume Fraction Determination of Ethanol in Splash-Blended Fuel Mixture
Volume Fraction Determination of Ethanol in Splash-Blended Fuel Mixture

January 24, 2019

While electric vehicles are becoming more mainstream the use of traditional gasoline engines will have a place in society for decades to come...

Cleaning Up IPA Production with Stage-by-Stage MIR Analysis
Cleaning Up IPA Production with Stage-by-Stage MIR Analysis

January 24, 2019

2-Propanol is one of the most common solvents in the world, with over 2 million tons produced in 2003 (Science)...

Thank you for reading The Analytical Scientist

To continue reading, either register for a free account below or login.

Register or Login

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.