Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2019 / Aug / Pride and Prejudice
Career Pathways Sponsored

Pride and Prejudice

Further action is needed to support LGBT+ scientists

By Matt Hallam 08/12/2019 1 min read

Share

In the sciences, as in society, inequities persist in spite of progress. Inequality adopts different forms in each of our minds, molded by our own beliefs and experiences – to some, an omnipotent boogieman fat on insecurities; to others, an impenetrable cloud of blissful ignorance.  

Here in the UK, reports of hate crimes motivated by race, religion, sexuality and gender have skyrocketed in recent years – 144 percent in five years for those targeting LGBT+ individuals. I had always viewed the scientific community as a safe haven from such issues because my own experiences have been so overwhelmingly positive. But that’s not the case for all members of the LGBT+ community.

This reality was made clear to me by the findings of a recent report: “Exploring the Workplace for LGBT+ Physical Scientists” (1). Highlighting rates of workplace discrimination as high as 32 percent, with over a quarter of participants expressing they had considered leaving the field for related reasons, it makes for uncomfortable reading. Coincidentally, the Bank of England announced that Alan Turing would feature on the new £50 note just weeks after these findings were published. I needed a stiff drink to process the dichotomy of these revelations. 

Turing’s acknowledgement is welcome, but feels bittersweet – a classic case of "too little, too late." The truth is, though much has changed since the wartime days of Turing, the attitudes underlying his persecution remain an adversity faced by many on a daily basis. Recognizing that these barriers exist is a first step - but what comes next?

The aforementioned report suggests we produce visible support for LGBT+ colleagues, improve policies to address harassment and discrimination, and introduce specialized training where appropriate. Such suggestions are valuable and, alongside movements like 500 Queer Scientists (an initiative to improve LGBT+ visibility in the field) and AZPlus (an empowering resource for LGBT+ AstraZeneca employees), may guide us towards positive change.

All change, however, starts at an individual level – so ask yourself what you can do to support your LGBT+ colleagues. The mountains ahead are daunting, but we cannot quake in their shadows. Together, we must tackle the climb.
 

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. Institute of Physics, Royal Astronomical Society and Royal Society of Chemistry, “Exploring the workplace for LGBT+ physical scientists”, June 2019 Report. Available at: https://rsc.li/2Jz9j6Q. Accessed August 5, 2019.

About the Author(s)

Matt Hallam

I've always wanted a job that fosters creativity - even when I worked on the assembly line in a fish factory. Outside work, I satisfy this need by writing questionable fiction. The venture into science writing was an unexpected departure from this fiction, but I'm truly grateful for the opportunity to combine my creative side with my scientific mind as Editor of The Analytical Scientist.

More Articles by Matt Hallam

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

Sitting Down With… The Past: Marja-Liisa Riekkola
Career Pathways
Sitting Down With… The Past: Marja-Liisa Riekkola

December 6, 2024

1 min read

We dive into the archive of 2014 for insight and inspiration – this time with Marja-Liisa Riekkola

How to Succeed in Commercial Innovation
Career Pathways
How to Succeed in Commercial Innovation

December 12, 2024

4 min read

Sell your story, stay alert, be careful who you hire, and focus intensely on execution

Musings from The Power List: Konstantin Shoykhet
Career Pathways
Musings from The Power List: Konstantin Shoykhet

December 18, 2024

4 min read

Konstantin Shoykhet, Agilent, talks about exciting developments in liquid chromatography, big challenges, and instrument accessibility

Could AI Ever Replace The Analytical Scientist?
Career Pathways
Could AI Ever Replace The Analytical Scientist?

December 18, 2024

1 min read

Working closely with an ever-expanding network of experts helps keep our content relevant and engaging. And keeps artificial intelligence at bay, right?!

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.