Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data and AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma and Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2018 / Oct / Burns After Reading?
Mass Spectrometry Omics Metabolomics & Lipidomics

Burns After Reading?

Metabolomic analysis of Burns manuscripts sorts the facts from the fakes

By Joanna Cummings 10/10/2018 1 min read

Share

A team from the University of Glasgow, UK, performed a chemical analysis on documents purportedly written by Scottish poet, Robert Burns – and developed a method to identify the genuine manuscripts. Comparison of the ink spectra using HRMS allowed them to create an authenticity map to distinguish the authentic versions – but not without a few analytical (and practical) issues along the way. The project was the result of a multidisciplinary collaboration between Karl Burgess (Head of Metabolomics) and Gerry Carruthers (Professor of Scottish Literature and a Burns expert). “Gerry was looking for someone who could use a chemical analysis technique to distinguish real from faked Burns manuscripts, and my PhD student recommended me,” says Burgess. “At the same time, I was trying to recruit someone to do surface analysis mass spectrometry, and James Newton came on board. The rest is history!”

They started off with DESI-MS. “James spent his first year building a robotically controlled DESI (desorption electrospray ionization) source, optimizing it, and faking Burns documents to provide samples that we could test to destruction. DESI turned out to be relatively insensitive, and we would have had to fold the documents up to fit them onto the source,” says Burgess. Liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) also required them to fold the documents, but the quality of the spectra convinced the team to find a workaround. “We ended up using manual LESA, pipetting a couple of microliters of solvent onto the document by hand before transferring it to the Advion NanoMate for direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS),” says Burgess. This simple method meant they were able to take a bottle of solvent, some tips, a pipette and a bag of tubes to a library or collection, and sample documents on site.

The first problem they encountered, Burgess says, ultimately had one of the best outcomes of the project. “We wanted a positive control for the inks and we mentioned this to our collector–collaborator, who brought us a hand-written book from the 17th century, describing the production of lots of liquids – including inks (as well as carbonized ivory, stale beer and wasp galls),” he says. “James then used the recipes to make the inks.”

Now they have a working method, the team want to build a database of hundreds of documents, so that they can put other authors’ works into context.

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. J Newton et al., “Minimally destructive atmospheric ionization mass spectrometry authenticates authorship of historical manuscripts”, Sci Rep, 8, 10944 (2018). DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-28810-2.

About the Author(s)

Joanna Cummings

A former library manager and storyteller, I have wanted to write for magazines since I was six years old, when I used to make my own out of foolscap paper and sellotape and distribute them to my family. Since getting my MSc in Publishing, I’ve worked as a freelance writer and content creator for both digital and print, writing on subjects such as fashion, food, tourism, photography – and the history of Roman toilets.

More Articles by Joanna Cummings

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

Related Content

 This Week’s Mass Spec News
Mass Spectrometry
This Week’s Mass Spec News

April 4, 2025

2 min read

 What If Computers Could Smell?
Mass Spectrometry
What If Computers Could Smell?

April 3, 2025

13 min read

Computers can “see” and “hear,” but fully digitizing scent has so far eluded science – but that may soon change

The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #6
Mass Spectrometry
The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #6

December 3, 2024

3 min read

Syft Technologies’ William Pelet introduces the Syft Explorer – the world's first fully mobile, real-time, and direct trace gas analyzer

The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #4
Mass Spectrometry
The Analytical Scientist Innovation Awards 2024: #4

December 5, 2024

6 min read

Thermo Fisher Scientific’s high-sensitivity mass spec for translational omics research – the Stellar MS – is ranked 4th in our annual Innovation Awards

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.