Subscribe to Newsletter

Daniel W. Armstrong

R.A. Welch Distinguished Professor, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Arlington, USA

The secret to successful interdisciplinary collaboration?There is no secret, just a decision: you can either remain isolated, self-acquiring knowledge and raising funds (which can be a costly and lengthy process), or you can collaborate with individuals/groups from different fields to increase productivity, decrease costs, and help you reach solutions at a faster pace. Working amongst others also broadens your overall knowledge, which could be applied to future research projects. When interdisciplinary projects work – which is often – problems are solved, publications are produced, and everyone is happy. 

Fostering interdisciplinary working? Finding productive scientists who are already doing this, rather than those who focus on “scientific politics” – which is contrary to common practice, especially in academic research. Forcing interdisciplinary work that slows progress and does little to solve problems is deleterious, which unfortunately is the approach taken by most funding agencies and some universities and companies. By putting resources where they’re producing the best results in an optimal timeframe is the logical approach to take – hence, it is not often done other than in cases of dire national emergencies.

Biggest challenge facing the field?In the US, it’s the decreasing production of PhD analytical scientists – especially separation scientists. This is somewhat nonsensical as the most prevalent jobs in chemistry are in separations, mass spec, and combinations of the two. Numerous companies are having to hire people that aren't trained analytical scientists to complete analytical research projects. When graduates have multiple job offers up to a year before graduating whereas those in other disciplines have nothing, you know that something is out of balance.

Part of the Power List 2021

Read more

Welcome to our annual celebration of the world’s most influential analytical scientists!

Go to The Power List 2021

Part of the Power List 2017

The Magnificent Tens

The Magnificent Tens
After 2016’s celebration of women in analytical science, we return to the Top 100 for 2017.
But there’s a twist. This summer, we asked you to nominate scientists in ten categories – from the stars of separation science, to omics explorers, to the mentors training the next generation.

Go to The Power List 2017

Part of the Power List 2015

100 reasons to be proud

Welcome to The Power List 2015 – our second foray into the Top 100 most influential people in the world of analytical science. Though we realize our list can (and should) never be definitive, who can argue that the faces within – both familiar and new – do not beautifully highlight the brilliance and diversity found within our sometimes undervalued field?

Go to The Power List 2015

Part of the Power List 2013

100 most influential people

That’s the question we posed to ourselves – and then to you – over two months ago, ahead of open nominations and a painstaking judging process. Here, without further ado, we celebrate the answer.

Go to The Power List 2013

Register to The Analytical Scientist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine