Like most websites The Analytical Scientist uses cookies. In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. Learn more.
Subscribe to Newsletter
Techniques & Tools Sample Preparation, Mass Spectrometry

Sample Prep Sorcery

It is striking that someone of Pat Sandra’s stature should need to highlight sample preparation as an issue – especially given that experienced practitioners should be acutely aware of its importance in terms of both time and potential analytical error. In “Three Wizards of Sample Preparation” (see three esteemed colleagues provide some important insights on the topic. I’d like to share and discuss the comments that I found particularly interesting.

First, I was intrigued by the divergent importance attached to sample preparation by different analytical communities, specifically the gap between academia, instrument manufacturers and end-users referred to by Frank David. Sample prep is arguably most important to the end-users who deal with the challenges of analyzing large numbers of samples that demand accurate data on a day-to-day basis. If the importance of sample preparation is not sufficiently recognized in academia (and there are notable exceptions, think for example of Sandra’s development of SBSE), the reason may well lie in sample preparation not being considered “sexy” enough, to quote Hans-Gerd Jannsen. I agree that the situation is exacerbated by significant developments in instrumentation, especially MS, which has led to less emphasis being placed on sample prep. To some extent, this is understandable considering the limitations of sample prep (as the saying goes, the best form of sample preparation is no sample preparation). Due to a combination of these reasons, there is an unfortunate trend to underestimate the value of sample preparation and rely on instrumental performance to provide the required results. However, as also pointed out by Frank, errors made in sample preparation cannot be corrected later, whatever the instrumentation. Indeed, it is important to be aware of the limitations of even the most advanced instruments – electrospray ionization for example, even combined with highly selective MS/MS, is susceptible to ionization suppression, which can, in most cases, be avoided through judicious sample pretreatment.

A second area of concern raised by all three experts is the lag between sample prep developments and their implementation in regulated environments. This “conservatism” of accreditation bodies means that the benefits of improved methods are not realized in this environment. Again, this is partially understandable in light of the fact that methods need to be re-validated. But surely, replacing antiquated methods with techniques that have been extensively studied and optimized by researchers over many years is worth the effort.

The “Wizards” agreed on the most important developments in sample preparation, which brings me to my third point, the future of sample preparation: miniaturization, automation and higher throughput. Implied in miniaturization is the important move towards “greener” sample prep methods, which I’m sure we all agree is a very good thing (think of Pat’s comment on the excessive use of dichloromethane).

Finally, the question may (and indeed has been) asked: does sample preparation get the attention it deserves? Based on the comments of the Wizards, the answer in not clear-cut. On the one hand, it is clear that some research groups in academia and industry certainly appreciate the importance of sample prep; at the same time, this is not universally true across the board, and examples of impractical, or worse, illogical, sample preparation methods abound.

The question then becomes how the situation may be improved. I agree with Frank’s view that much of this is simply “down to a lack of expertise” – that the problem is not a lack of “methods and equipment, but rather education”. This is surely something that can be improved – as David Benanou points out: “the importance of sample prep should and must become more prominent in universities”. It is unfortunately true that in many academic institutions sample prep is included only as an afterthought in the curriculum, with much more emphasis placed on advanced chromatography and MS. If graduate students were better trained, they would transfer an appreciation of the importance of sample prep to industry and academia as the next generation of analytical scientists…

Forums like Riva, which enable discussions between leading scientists in the field, can only contribute to giving sample preparation the attention it deserves. And this is surely one of the intended – and very important – outcomes of Pat Sandra’s comments.

Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Analytical Scientist and its sponsors.
Stay up to date with our other newsletters and sponsors information, tailored specifically to the fields you are interested in

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

About the Author
André de Villiers

André de Villiers is an associate professor at the Department of Chemistry and Polymer Science at Stellenbosch University, South Africa. His research activities include fundamental studies and the practical application of chromatographic separations, with the emphasis on natural product analysis. “My specific areas of interest include comprehensive two-dimensional liquid- and gas chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, novel sample preparation methods and advanced mass spectrometric methods in combination with separation methods.”

Related Application Notes
Air quality studies: Increasing productivity & data precision

| Contributed by Markes International Ltd

Measuring PFAS pollution in ambient air

| Contributed by Markes International Ltd

Instrumental Analysis to Visualize Differences in Taste

| Contributed by Shimadzu

Related Webinars
Techniques & Tools Spectroscopy
The Analytical Spectroscopy Technology Forum

| Sponsored by WITec GmbH, Bruker Optics, Hamamatsu Photonics Europe GmbH, and DRS Daylight Solutions

Techniques & Tools Liquid Chromatography
The Next-Level LC-MS Technology Forum

| Sponsored by ACD Labs, Agilent, Tosoh and Andrew Alliance (Waters)

Techniques & Tools Thin Layer Chromatography
Comprehensive HPTLC Fingerprinting for Quality Control of Herbal Drugs

| Sponsored by CAMAG

Register to The Analytical Scientist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine