Subscribe to Newsletter
Techniques & Tools Forensics, Mass Spectrometry, Technology, Spectroscopy, Gas Chromatography

Adding Science Behind the Canine

Back in 2013, an article entitled “Every Dog Has Its Day” in The Analytical Scientist suggested that the canine could be replaced by emerging technologies. “A new ‘sniff’ test for explosives uses direct, real-time vapor detection in a bid to put our canine colleagues out of work in the screening of people, baggage and cargo,” it boldly stated ( The article focused on using ionization chemistry at the front end of a mass spectrometer that could measure in parts per quadrillion. Our research project takes a rather different approach...

Instead of comparing and contrasting dogs with the latest technology, we found it beneficial to associate and align the capabilities of the canine with the field application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) teamed with solid phase microextraction (SPME). Why? We were aiming to increase scientific capability in a very special application area: arson investigations. At fire scenes, investigators look for traces of flammable liquids using electronic sniffers or specially trained canines. Debris is collected and must be examined by a properly certified forensic lab – a process that can take weeks.

Our Phase I testing involved bench-scale fires, which demonstrated the ability of GC-MS to identify 13 different ignitable liquids. A sensitive volatile organic vapor detector utilizing photo ionization technology (PID) was used to locate the highest concentration of vapors, which were then sampled using an exposed SPME fiber, followed immediately by hand-portable GC-MS. The initial testing provided significant improvements in sampling techniques including a method proposed by Dr. DeHaan that increased vapor concentrations while reducing cross contamination. Phase II testing – with full-scale room fires and extended post-flashover exposures – confirmed that the identification of ignitable liquid vapors from fire debris was possible, with reported vapor concentrations as low as 5000 parts per billion.

Phase III tests have been designed to evaluate our method in actual fire scenes in Texas and California, putting science behind the canine. And although the testing will not be concluded until 2015, the results have already demonstrated the system’s capability to identify ignitable liquid vapors at the fire scene when located by trained canine teams.

And so back to the canine... “The sensitivity of canines is unknown... This work represents the first direct vapor detection of explosives so it should be comparable to the canine response,” said Robert Ewing, a senior research scientist at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the aforementioned article. And the canine olfactory system certainly sets a high standard – it is estimated to be in the order of a few ppb for many compounds.

Some of our significant research findings link GC-MS data to the work of fire/arson canines. During a canine certification test in Texas, 10 microliters of gasoline was placed onto carpet in an open-air room, about 10-meters square. Eleven of the twelve canines were able to pinpoint the source, ranging from 7 cm to within 0.7 cm of the target. Instrument readings revealed canine hits below the detection limits of the PID detector. By utilizing a 15-minute SPME sampling time with the DeHaan sampling methodology, GC-MS data identified the components of gasoline. While the sensitivity of the canine olfactory system is remarkable, the canine alert obviously cannot discriminate volatile fuels present; critical identification of possible accelerants from the residues of products used as solvents in adhesives, insecticides, fabric cleaners, or those that are inherent to the consumer product or its raw materials, can only be made by with GC-MS analysis.

What have we learned during our research project? Well, we’ve found that it is much more advantageous to collaborate with the canine rather than try to compete with it! By combining traditional and new approaches, we can provide the decision maker with additional timely information. Our airports are in desperate need of improved detection of explosives. The predominant technology being used today –  ion mobilization spectroscopy (IMS) calibrated to look for nitrogen based explosives – is much maligned. The use of ionization with mass spectrometry is a significant improvement, but it may never be evaluated. Combining canines with advanced instrumentation may be a better idea than arguing for their replacement. Dogs are faster and more flexible than any instrument-based technology alone.

Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Analytical Scientist and its sponsors.
Stay up to date with our other newsletters and sponsors information, tailored specifically to the fields you are interested in

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

  1. J. D. DeHaan, G. S. Dobson, and D. A. Matthew, “On-scene Characterization of Flammable Liquid Vapors Using GC/MS and SPME Sampling” International Fire Service Investigation Science & Technology (University of Maryland, Aldelphi, MD, 7th edition, 2014).
About the Authors
John DeHaan
John DeHaan

John DeHaan has over 42 years of experience in fire- and explosion-related forensic science and has been deeply involved with improving fire investigation. After earning his BS (physics 1969), he spent 29 years with public forensic labs. He has authored six editions of Kirk’s Fire Investigation since 1982 and was co- author with David Icove in Forensic Fire Scene Reconstruction since 2004. Since 1999, he has been president of Fire-Ex Forensics, Inc., a private consulting firm that provides services to police and fire agencies, public defenders, private attorneys and insurers in fire and explosion cases across the US and internationally.

Gareth S. Dobson
Gareth S. Dobson

Gareth Dobson is an analytical chemist and senior research scientist at Smiths Detection. As a graduate student at the University Paris 6 and in collaboration with DSTL and the CEB, he concentrated on development of mass spectrometry instrumentation and method development. As a postdoctoral fellow at the University of New Mexico he participated in the development of a miniature linear ion trap and distance-of-flight mass spectrometry, an alternative to time of flight. Gareth is the subject matter expert for Smiths Detection on GC/MS and has more than ten years of experience in the field.

David Matthew
David Matthew

David Matthew is a 28-year veteran of the fire service in Kansas and California. He is active as an educator in developing, reviewing and delivering training programs while functioning at the local, regional, state and federal levels, as a subject matter expert to public safety related issues. He is an avid researcher with over six publications. David earned a Master of Security Studies from the Naval Postgraduate School. He has also graduated from the National Fire Academy’s Executive Fire Officer Program and has attained the Chief Fire Officer designation from the Commission on Professional Credentialing.

Register to The Analytical Scientist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine