Cookies

Like most websites The Analytical Scientist uses cookies. In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. Learn more.
Techniques & Tools Sample Preparation, Technology, Data Analysis, Pharma & Biopharma, Materials, Polymers, Gas Chromatography, Thin Layer Chromatography, Preparative/Process Chromatography

Case study: Effects of gamma-ray sterilization on high molecular weight

sponsored by Malvern Panalytical

Introduction

Medical grade poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been used over many years for a variety of medical applications such as artificial joints, dentures, bone cement and fillers for cosmetic purposes.  One of the main, and oldest, usages is for intraocular lenses to treat cataracts, with medical grade PMMA used to correct vision since the late 1940's.  For this application, the polymer must be of high purity with no significant traces of residual monomer.  Indeed the monomer used to make PMMA, methyl methacrylate (MMA), is a possible carcinogen so it is especially important that medical grade PMMA be totally free of the potentially harmful monomer.  Furthermore for medical use, the PMMA must be free of other organic contaminants.  To that end, new methods of polymer sterilization are being explored.  This application note investigates ultra high molecular weight PMMA (UHMW-PMMA) and the effect of irradiation at doses typically used for sterilization.  The absolute molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the gamma-sterilized PMMA were compared to the unsterilized UHMW-PMMA using triple detection GPC/SEC.  In conjunction with the light scattering detector, the viscometer was used to study the structure of the polymer before and after irradiation, through the Mark-Houwink plot.

Figure 1: Triple detection chromatograms of the samples. a) for the ultra-high molecular weight PMMA sample and b) for the gamma-sterilized PMMA

Although the raw data shown in figure 1 has been adjusted for the inter-detector delay volume, the traces of the refractometer, the viscometer and the low angle light scattering detectors are not peaking at the same elution volume.  This is due to the fact that the detectors are measuring different, but complementary molecular parameters.  The refractometer signal (RI) is proportional to the concentration while the LALS detector has a signal proportional to both the concentration and the molecular weight.  The fact that both are not peaking at the same elution volume indicates that the sample has significant polydispersity.  The viscometer signal is proportional to both the viscosity and the concentration, so the peak position will be different to those from both the RI and light scattering signals.

In table 1 the results calculated from the triple detector system are given for two injections of both PMMA samples.  The weight average molecular weight, Mw, for the UHMW-PMMA sample is more than 5 million g/mol or Daltons (Da).  The sterilized PMMA exhibits a much lower Mw of 320,000 Da.  The OmniSEC software used to calculate the molecular weight also gives the different moments of the molecular weight distribution of the sample.  It does this by taking the instantaneous molecular weight Mi for each slice along with the instantaneous concentration, ci.  The number average molecular weight (Mn), which is the first moment of the distribution, is used together with the Mw, to give the polydispersity (Mw/Mn) for the sample.  The UHMW-PMMA has a moderate polydispersity.  The sterilized sample has a higher polydispersity resulting from the polymer degradation, a conclusion that was not obvious by just looking at the width of the peaks.  The peak width is a function of the resolution power of the columns, as well as the real polymer molecular weight distribution, and there may not be a completely linear calibration curve, particularly at the extremities of the column separation range.

Table 1: Results calculated by OmniSEC for the 2 repeats of the 2 PMMA samples

Table 1 also presents the average intrinsic viscosity ([η]), of the solution in dL/g.  The UHMW-PMMA has a much higher viscosity than the sterilized one, as expected from the molecular weight difference.

Figure 2 shows the normalized distribution of both PMMA samples.  The y-axis is the weight fraction over the differential logarithm of the molecular weight.  It is obvious by looking at this graph that statically all the PMMA has degraded but no structural information can be inferred from this graph alone.

Figure 2: Normalized weight fraction vs. log M. of the samples

Figure 3 shows the Mark-Houwink plot for the two PMMA samples.  The y-axis is the intrinsic viscosity on a log scale.  The intrinsic viscosity was measured directly from the differential viscometer for each slice of elution volume.  The x-axis is the absolute molecular weight measured by the light scattering detector.  For the UHMW sample there is clearly two slopes corresponding to the main peak of the sample and the shoulder at lower molecular weight.  The shoulder is on the left part of the graph with a range roughly of 5.8 to 6.4 in log molecular weight units.  This section has a larger slope than the section with a higher molecular weight.  The slope is the Mark-Houwink a value.  For the lower molecular weight part of the UHMW-PMMA, the value of the exponent a (MH-a) is 0.8, indicating a linear structure of PMMA.  The higher molecular weight section, above log 6.4 has a slope, MH-a, of 0.5, indicating a branched polymer.  The irradiated polymer in figure 3 shows a similar curvature, but not enough statistical information is available for the lower molecular weight fraction to calculate accurately the MH-a value in this section.  For the higher molecular weight part, above log 5.0, or 10 000 Da, the MH-a value is 0.7.  This value is much higher than the 0.5 for the UHMW-PMMA indicating that the cleaving action from the gamma rays targeted preferentially the branching points on the polymer chain reducing the long chain branching in the sample.

Figure 3: Mark-Houwink plot of the samples

The Zimm-Stockmayer expression for this type of polymer is given below, where nw is the branching number.

The branching frequency (λ), can then be determined from the expression shown below, where Mi is the mass for each chromatographic slice and FR is the repeat factor, defined as the mass of a number of repeat units.

By applying the Zimm-Stockmayer branching calculations and by using literature Mark-Houwink values for linear PMMA in THF, the number of branches in the material was estimated. This is shown as the cyan line (left-hand y-axis) in figure 4 and estimates the number of branches to be an average of almost 5 per molecule and reaching as high as 13 branches per molecule at the highest molecular weights.

Read the full article now

Log in or register to read this article in full and gain access to The Analytical Scientist’s entire content archive. It’s FREE and always will be!

Login

Or register now - it’s free and always will be!

You will benefit from:

  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine
Register

Or Login via Social Media

By clicking on any of the above social media links, you are agreeing to our Privacy Notice.

  1. CM Pratt et al, Polymer Degradation and Stability 91 (2006) 2315-2317
  2. BH Zimm and WH Stockmayer, J. Chem. Phys. 17 (1949) 1301-1314
  3. YJ Chen et al, Polymer Bulletin, 30 (1993) 575-578

About the Author

Baljit Ghatora

Material Research Group, Kingston University, London, UK.

Newsletter

Send me the latest from The Analytical Scientist.

Sign up now

Register to The Analytical Scientist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:

  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine

Register