Landmark Literature: Spectroscopy
Four expert spectroscopists each select a game-changing paper - and highlight its impact on the wider field or their own research path.
Norman Dovichi, Mary Kate Donais, Marcia F Mesko, Dominic J. Hare | | Opinion
A Single Step
Landmark Paper: DY Chen and NJ Dovichi, “Singlemolecule detection in capillary electrophoresis: Molecular shot noise as a fundamental limit to chemical analysis”, Anal Chem, 68, 690-696 (1996).
Analytical chemists spent most of the 20th century developing and improving instrumentation to perform ultrasensitive chemical analysis. The community ultimately achieved single molecule detection in the 1980s with laser-induced fluorescence. Those early studies were simply interested in addressing the formidable issues associated with minimizing noise, maximizing signal, and processing data to confidently detect and count molecules. This paper with David Chen was the first to discuss fundamental ramifications of measurements with small numbers of molecules.
Optical shot noise – observed as a Poisson distribution in detected photons in photon counting experiments – is a fundamental noise source that ultimately limits the precision of spectroscopic measurements. In this paper, we demonstrated the analogous phenomenon of molecular shot-noise, where performing analysis on small numbers of analyte molecules introduces a fundamental noise source. As expected, molecular shot noise limits the precision of quantitative measurements, particularly when dealing with small numbers of molecules. It was more surprising to discover that molecular shot noise also limited the precision with which we can measure migration time and peak width in separations.
What makes it stand out? This paper was the first systematic study of fundamental issues associated with quantitative analysis on small numbers of molecules. As analytical chemists, we have been trained to consider the accuracy and precision of measurements. Single molecule counting is the ultimate quantitative measurement; after all, one can have no higher accuracy than counting the number of molecules in a sample. However, the precision of that measurement is ultimately limited by Poisson statistics: fluctuations in the number of molecules taken for chemical analysis is a fundamental and irreducible source of uncertainty.
Our experience with ultrasensitive analysis based on fluorescence detection with capillary electrophoresis informed our work on separation of DNA fragments generated by Sanger sequencing, which resulted in our development of capillary array electrophoresis for highthroughput DNA analysis, which led to the sequencing of the human genome ahead of schedule and under budget.
Read the full article now
Log in or register to read this article in full and gain access to The Analytical Scientist’s entire content archive. It’s FREE and always will be!
Or register now - it’s free and always will be!
You will benefit from:
- Unlimited access to ALL articles
- News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
- Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine
Or Login via Social Media
By clicking on any of the above social media links, you are agreeing to our Privacy Notice.