Subscribe to Newsletter
Fields & Applications Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Technology, Forensics, Metabolomics & Lipidomics, Cannabis Testing

Saliva Sampling Reveals All

Identifying drivers under the influence of THC has clear implications for road safety. But it’s not easy, demanding tests of behavioral impairment complemented by chemical analysis of defined biological specimens, including blood, which can be expensive, time consuming, and invasive.

Now, researchers from the Institute of Legal Medicine of the Medical University Innsbruck, Austria, have developed a simple but effective workflow for reliable quantification of THC and its metabolites in oral fluid samples, which can suffer analyte loss.

Sample preparation methods typically remove solid components, such as food particles and debris, from the analytical workflow through centrifugation of the oral fluid. But the Innsbruck team took the opposite approach, extracting the cannabinoids from the solid pellet produced by centrifugation ahead of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis.

“We demonstrated that processing of the pellet represents a valuable alternative for cannabinoid quantification in oral fluid,” says lead author Herbert Oberacher.

The team have already demonstrated the applicability of the method to forensic testing. With help from local police, the researchers analyzed 195 samples collected either from opioid addicts or persons suspected of driving under the influence of drugs. When they compared their oral fluid analysis results to those from blood analysis (the gold standard for forensic testing of cannabis use), the team found they could identify those individuals with the presence of THC in their blood with an accuracy of 97.9 percent. 

“Despite considerable success of swabs for oral fluid drug testing, problems related to analyte loss due to unspecific binding are still encountered – particularly in the context of cannabinoid testing,” says Oberacher. “Our report might help further the understanding the underlying principles involved in oral sample preparation, which could help improve extraction processes and recoveries.” 

But there is a slight saliva snag. The team collected samples using the Greiner Bio-One Saliva Collection System (GBO SCS), which rinses the oral cavity with an extraction solution containing a citrate buffer stimulating salivary flow. Unfortunately, the GBO SCS has since been discontinued… 

Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Analytical Scientist and its sponsors.
Stay up to date with our other newsletters and sponsors information, tailored specifically to the fields you are interested in

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

  1. V Reinstadler et al., PubMed (2023). DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5651. 
About the Author
Jessica Allerton

Associate Editor, The Analytical Scientist

Related Application Notes
Safer AAV Analysis with Non-toxic AEX Method

| Contributed by Tosoh

Non-targeted profiling of polar metabolites in human plasma

| Contributed by YMC

High Sensitivity allergen detection in wine samples

| Contributed by YMC

Related Product Profiles
The fine Art of Method Development

| Contributed by Shimadzu Europa

Higher Peaks – Clearly.

| Contributed by Shimadzu Europa

Compact with countless benefits

| Contributed by Shimadzu Europa

Register to The Analytical Scientist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine

Register