Cookies

Like most websites The Analytical Scientist uses cookies. In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. Learn more.

Daniel Armstrong

The Power List 2015


Daniel Armstrong

Robert A. Welch Distinguished Professor, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Arlington, USA.

Most important lesson A) If you have imagination and work harder (and more effectively) than others, you are likely to be successful.  B) Create fads rather than following them (most researchers just follow the prevailing scientific fads).

Most unexpected outcome One of the most unexpected things is that our initial interest and work in chiral molecular recognition rapidly morphed into a practical commercial technique (enantiomeric separations) that changed the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory focus. Even more surprising was that over a decade or two later, our early findings resulted in billions of dollars being spent in lawsuits between generic and more "mainstream" drug companies involving single enantiomer drugs. The general public and even most scientists have no idea what has been occurring in this area or the amounts of money being spent.

Encounters with serendipity As indicated in the previous answer, our fundamental interest in molecular recognition resulted in a practical, commercial series of LC and GC columns – which was not our initial interest or intent.  Fortunately we didn't ignore this possibility when it arose.  In another area, when synthesizing unique ionic liquids for a completely different project, we found that a few of them were enormously useful in MALDI-MS and ESI-MS.

Eye to the horizon... There are more analytical jobs (especially in industry) than in any other branch of chemistry. Most of these are in separations and MS, but other analytical areas are also desirable – if the individuals have broad skills. Further, there are fewer analytical PhDs than in other areas. This puts most analytical chemists in an attractive position in regards to “supply and demand”.  However, the federal research funding and the focus of most university departments is not commensurate with the importance of analytical chemistry or its contribution to society. There is more than a bit of jealousy and protectionism in some of the more staid but populous fields of chemistry. Personally, in the near future, I see the size of my group to be more or less constant. More important is to branch into new and interesting areas...

The Power List Like all lists, The Power List is interesting and somewhat controversial. Consequently, it garnered attention. I think it helped to put The Analytical Scientist “on the map”, so to speak.

Sitting Down With: tas.txp.to/1015/Armstrong


Part of the Power List 2015

100 reasons to be proud

Welcome to The Power List 2015 – our second foray into the Top 100 most influential people in the world of analytical science. Though we realize our list can (and should) never be definitive, who can argue that the faces within – both familiar and new – do not beautifully highlight the brilliance and diversity found within our sometimes undervalued field?

Go to The Power List 2015

Register to The Analytical Scientist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Analytical Scientist magazine

Register