The Analytical Scientist Power List returns to celebrate the successes of the field’s leading lights!
11/19/2013 | Jon Platt
How we can innovate by setting aside critical and logical thought processes, and embracing the lost skill of imagination.
11/19/2013 | John Coates
From a seventeen-year vantage point, I offer these recollections into the development of a technology-based consulting business.
11/19/2013 | Hans-Gerd Janssen, Yolanda Pico, Michele Suman, Rudolf Krska, Michel Nielen
We sample the views of five food analysis experts. Is separation science still the greatest thing since sliced bread, or are there bigger fish to fry?
11/18/2013 | Alexander Makarov
The development of Orbitrap™ has taken up all of my professional life. It’s been a story of luck, perseverance, and, ultimately, success.
11/18/2013 | Imre Molnár
Incorporating updated analytical methods and approaches into pharmacopoeias – the bibles of pharmaceutical standards – would save a great deal of time and money.
11/18/2013 | Konstantin Choikhet
An article by Monika Dittmann on volume-based HPLC triggered a debate on the practicality of the concept. Here, we present the questions that were raised and how they were answered.
11/18/2013 | Lloyd Snyder
Is there a pecking order for scientists? If so, how is it determined and what does it mean?
11/18/2013 | Rich Whitworth
Taiwan proudly set the tightest limits on glyphosate, but failed to measure the herbicide
Having thrust 100 analytical scientists to the heights of stardom in our 2013 Power List, we went back to assess the reaction of colleagues, friends and family. The response was mixed.
Do you have big data, lots of questions, and no expertise? This crowd-sourced data analysis platform could be the answer – if you can afford it
Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.
Register
On an IM-MS Crusade
Lighting Up Archaeological Science
The Winner Takes It All